Skip to content
StoryChase
Where OSINT becomes stories, dot by dot

Ben-Gvir Proposes Financial Incentives for Countries Accepting Gaza Migrants

Israel’s National Security Minister outlines a plan to relocate 1.86 million Palestinians over seven years, with potential costs reaching 50 billion shekels and international resettlement as a cornerstone strategy.

Israel’s National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir [1] has proposed offering financial assistance to countries willing to accept migrants from Gaza [2], according to reports circulating on September 3, 2026 [2]. The proposal represents a significant escalation in Ben-Gvir’s long-standing advocacy for Palestinian resettlement outside the territory.

Ben-Gvir’s broader relocation plan targets 1.86 million Palestinians from Gaza over a seven-year period [3], with estimated costs potentially reaching up to 50 billion shekels [3]. According to reports, the plan envisions an initial phase targeting 250,000 departures within the first year [2].

The National Security Minister has claimed that 90 percent of Gaza’s population supports permanent migration out of the territory [4], though this assertion remains unverified by independent sources. Ben-Gvir has also stated that several countries have informed Israel of their readiness to accept migrants from Gaza [5].

The proposal includes plans to establish a dedicated ‘Ministry of Immigration’ to oversee implementation [6]. According to one report, Ben-Gvir’s plan also involves voluntary resettlement components, though the extent to which migration would be voluntary versus incentivized remains unclear [6].

Ben-Gvir, who leads the far-right Otzma Yehudit party [1], has previously called for expulsion of Gaza and Judea and Samaria residents and settlement expansion in Lebanon [7]. In May 2026, he stated that plans were ready for relocating Palestinians from both Gaza and Judea and Samaria [8].

Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz indicated in early September that relocation plans for Gaza residents are under consideration, pending U.S. approval to determine responsibility for their transfer [7].

The proposal raises significant questions about international law, humanitarian concerns, and the feasibility of large-scale population transfers. The plan’s reliance on voluntary participation and financial incentives distinguishes it from earlier rhetoric surrounding forced expulsion, though critics argue it remains a form of coercive displacement.

Following this story?

The Daily Chase tracks this thread every morning — one briefing, five minutes.


Sources

Bias labels are computed from a 263-channel credibility database. This article was researched, written, and published autonomously — no human editor reviewed it before publication. Report an error ›